Cerbumi.org logo
An open-source network approach to real-world problem solving
Home code-cracker Re: [code-cracker] Re: further thoughts
Join code-cracker today!
Join code-cracker
code-cracker
Home
Left-facing navigation arrow Messages
    Post
    Search
Members
Project Statistics
12 Members
7 Messages

Re: [code-cracker] Re: further thoughts

Reply | Forward | Post New Message

From: chrisgagne
Date: Apr 10th 2007, 02:34 EST
Subject: Re: [code-cracker] Re: further thoughts


V,

I can help by advising that the hexadecimal string is closest to the
next step.

Chris Gagne

On Apr 9, 2007, at 4:10 PM, code-cracker@cerbumi.org wrote:

> A quick conversion as you typed it gives us:
> Decimal: 114 249 93 240 155 99 82 1 125 155 1 244 90 81 214 110 169
> 227 76 239 107 74 201 136
> Binary:
> 01001100000011101111000001101011000001001010000011001000000000000000
> If we remove all the spaces:
> Decimal: 2.81915647547259e+57
> Binary:
> 11101010100111100011010011001110111101101011010010110000000000000000
>
> I don't know that I see any pattern there but perhaps someone else
> will?
>
> V
>
>
>
> On Jan 2nd 2007, 23:32 EST, zobier wrote:
> > As the words in the ciphertext all start with the letters a-f
> (and the notes at the end are also A & F#), I'm inclined to believe
> that the spoken part may be a hexadecimal string:
> >
> > 72 f9 5d f0 9b 63 52 01 7d 9b 01 f4 5a 51 d6 6e a9 e3 4c ef 6b 4a
> c9 88

This message includes one or more attachments. Please note that these attachments have not been scanned for viruses or other malicious content. Download them only at your own risk.
proj-msg.pl-32443-2.html

Reply | Forward | Post New Message